******************************************************************
////////////// ////////////// //////////////
/// /// ///
/////// /////// ///////
/// /// ///
////////////// /// ///
******************************************************************
EFFector Online Volume 5 No. 4 3/19/1993 editors@eff.org
A Publication of the Electronic Frontier Foundation ISSN 1062-9424
-==--==--==-<>-==--==--==-
In this issue:
Victory in the Steve Jackson Games Case
EFF Pioneer Award Winners for 1993
Issues for K-12 Access to the Internet
-==--==--==-<>-==--==--==-
STEVE JACKSON GAMES WINS LAWSUIT
AGAINST U.S. SECRET SERVICE
A games publisher has won a lawsuit against the U.S. Secret Service
and the federal government in a ground-breaking case involving
computer publications and electronic mail privacy.
Sparks of the federal district court for the Western District of Texas
announced that the case of Steve Jackson Games et al. versus the U.S.
Secret Service and the United States Government has been decided
for the plaintiffs.
The plaintiffs, which include Steve Jackson, the company he founded,
and three users of the company's bulletin board system (BBS), sued
the government on claims that their statutory rights to electronic
mail privacy had been violated when the BBS and other computers,
computer crime investigation. These rights are protected under the
Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA), which extended most
of the protections of the federal Wiretap Act ("Title III") to electronic
mail.
Jackson and his company also claimed violations of the Privacy
Mitch Kapor, founder and chairman of the board for the Electronic
Frontier Foundation, the public interest/civil liberties organization
that has underwritten and supported the case since it was filed in
our position that users of computer bulletin board systems are
engaging in Constitutionally protected speech," Kapor said.
"This decision shows that perseverance pays off," he added. "We've
been at this for almost three years now, and we still don't know if it's
over -- the Justice Department might appeal it." Nevertheless, Kapor
Judge Sparks awarded more than $50,000 in damages to Steve
Jackson Games, citing lost profits and violations of the Privacy
$1,000 under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act for the
Secret Service seizure of their stored electronic mail. The judge also
The judge did not find that Secret Service agents had "intercepted"
the electronic communications that were captured when agents
The case was tried in Austin, Texas, by the Austin-based media law
firm George, Donaldson & Ford, with case assistance provided by the
Boston, Massachusetts, law firm of Silverglate & Good.
litigated the case, calls the decision "a solid first step toward
believes the case has particular significance for those who use
computers to prepare and distribute publications. "There is a strong
ndication from the judge's decision that the medium of publication is
rrelevant," he said, adding that "electronic publishers have the same
computers should be heartened by this decision. It indicates that the
the Privacy Protection Act.
"The case also demonstrates that there are limits on the kinds of
"the judge made it very clear that it is no excuse that the seizure of
accidental."
Mike Godwin, an attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation who
of the decision. "This case is a major step forward in protecting the
or who use computers to create and disseminate publications."
-==--==--==-<>-==--==--==-
SECOND ANNUAL EFF PIONEER AWARDS
On March 10, at the Computers, Freedom and Privacy Conference in
Burlingame, California, the Electronic Frontier Foundation presented
ts Second Annual Pioneer Awards to five recipients who were
field of computer-based communications. The 1993 Pioneer Award
Hughes and the USENET software developers, represented by the
Nominations for the Pioneer Awards were carried out over national
and international computer-communication systems from November
from these nominations.
The Pioneer Award Recipients
transmission of many messages from many sources to many
and related technologies have led him to co-found a number of
companies in Silicon Valley including Telebit, Packet Technologies (a
Communications, Metricom, InterFax and his current venture, Com21.
Dr. Vinton Cerf led the research project which developed the TCP/IP
used today by schools, government, corporations and an increasing
number of individuals to communicate with each other over the
ARPANET host protocols and managed the Internet, Packet
Communications and Networked Security programs for DARPA.
While working at MCI, he led the engineering effort to develop MCI
Mail. He is now vice president of the Corporation for National
Research Initiatives where he is responsible for projects involving
the Internet, electronic mail, and Knowledge Robot research.
Ward Christensen wrote the original software program,
"MODEM.ASM", which came to be called "Xmodem" or the
"Christensen protocol". For untold numbers of early-to-present day
computer communications users, Xmodem has made it possible to
transfer files, error-free, over phone lines from one computer to
another. Xmodem file transfer has been the major means of
nformation exchange for computer hobbyists and small business
users through the first decade of the personal computer revolution.
Mr. Christensen also programmed the first microcomputer dial-in
BBS, CBBS/Chicago, is still in operation. He is in his 25th year at IBM.
Dave Hughes has been an outspoken and effective grassroots
evangelist and spokesperson for popular computer networking and
electronic democracy for over a decade. He fashioned his own
computer system at Old Colorado City Communications in1985, and
online. He helped design and implement a personal computer
network connecting one-room rural schoolhouses in Montana to
connections and new applications to new populations here and
abroad. Perhaps most importantly, he is a tireless and enthusiastic
communicator, offering his experience, his inspiration and his vision
to any and all on the Net.
USENET is a distributed bulletin board system with approximately
two million readers worldwide. It came into being in late1979
through the inspiration of Tom Truscott and Jim Ellis combined with
the design and programming efforts of Steve Bellovin, Stephen
Daniel, and Dennis Rockwell. Following USENET's introduction in
began to be carried and circulated by a growing number of
networked sites. The ongoing work of numerous individuals has
allowed Usenet to survive its increasing popularity. The daily traffic
s now approximately 20,000 articles, totaling 50 megabytes, posted
to 2000 different newsgroups.
Tom Truscott is currently a distributed computing professional at
number of UNIX-related articles, and is a member of ACM, IEEE, and
Sigma Xi.
James Ellis is currently the Manager of Technical Development at the
Computer Emergency Response Team, which is the team created to
assist Internet sites with computer security incidents. At CERT, he is
Judges
This year's judges for the Pioneer Awards were: Jim Warren, Pioneer
Award recipient from 1992 who coordinated the judging process,
Steve Cisler of Apple Computer, Esther Dyson, editor of Release 1.0,
and Bob Metcalfe, Editor of Infoworld.
-==--==--==-<>-==--==--==-
COMMUNICATIONS POLICY FORUM
CPF Airs Issues for K-12 Access to the Internet
by Andrew Blau
The Communications Policy Forum (CPF), a non-partisan project
of the EFF that brings stakeholders together to discuss
communications policy issues, recently convened a roundtable to
explore some of the legal questions that arise when K-12 schools
legal experts with expertise in this and related areas, met to discuss
ssues of legal liability as this new medium enters an educational
A key concern is that students may be exposed to material that
electronic media, such as broadcast television, cable TV, and
audiotext, legal restrictions have been imposed to protect children
from ÒharmfulÓ or ÒindecentÓ material, and liability has been
assigned. No such framework exists for the Internet. Moreover, the
very strengths of the Internet Ð its decentralized, unhierarchical, and
essentially uncontrolled flow of traffic Ð offer distinct challenges to
those who would seek to control it in the interest of protecting
children. Finally, the tools available in other media Ð safe harbors,
lockboxes, or subscription schemes Ð don't fit in this environment.
Following a brief summary of the Internet and how it operates
and a review of how it is being used by a handful of K-12
nstitutions, participants identified specific problems and policy
ssues and considered existing statutes and case law for guidance.
The group also considered the potential effects of "harmful to
minors" or "obscene as to minors" statutes, which are on the books in
Court has agreed that it is constitutional to have such laws which
the First Amendment and would be constitutional for adults, to
minors.
Discussion then turned to various practical measures that carriers
and schools might take in light of what had been described. One
themselves, carriers could ensure that the school put in place a set of
teacher or other adult in control of what students access through the
It was also suggested that carriers could develop a contract that
only connects schools that agree to indemnify the provider.
Moreover, the carrier could require assurance that when access is
the minor's parent that includes provisions that hold the network
As an alternative, it was suggested that carriers could offer a
enable access to materials inappropriate for minors, and that local
modelled on those that parents are given before a field trip.
A handful of technical solutions were suggested throughout the
course of the meeting, and many elicited substantial interest. For
example, various participants suggested using encryption, programs
that flag key words or phrases and route them for human
ntervention, and mandatory password protection for all purveyors
of certain kinds of information.
Many participants seemed intrigued by a proposal to develop an
addressing standard under which someone who gets access by virtue
of his/her status as a K-12 student could get an address tag that
dentifies the student as such for various purposes. One example
for K-12 students. The appearance of the ".stu" tag would function
like any other identification stamp for access to certain materials.
Statutory immunity for carriers was also seen by almost all
legislative strategy may also highlight how these issues in the K-12
ssues and other sectors of the communications field.
It was also noted that all those interested in K-12 networking
need to educate the new Administration as it considers "information
mplementation of the NREN, and other programs. According to this
approach, a critical first step is to educate as many new players as
that addressing these liability issues is part of the package of
building the networks of tomorrow.
Conclusion
By the end of the session, most participants agreed that there are
no easy answers to the issues raised.
Yet participants also agreed that if the community of interested
educators, carriers, and public interest groups could establish
nstead of waiting for problems to arise, the resulting legislative and
educational access, as well as to provide a model for broadband
The value of the Internet as an educational resource is clear. As
one educator pointed out, our schools lose both students and teachers
because of inadequate access to resources; the Internet can enrich
the resources available to both teachers and students and is not
articulate a policy framework that can enable that potential to be
=============================================================
EFFector Online is published by
The Electronic Frontier Foundation
666 Pennsylvania Ave., Washington, DC 20003
Phone: +1 202 544-9237 FAX: +1 202 547 5481
Internet Address: eff@eff.org
Coordination, production and shipping by Cliff Figallo, EFF
Online Communications Coordinator (fig@eff.org)
Reproduction of this publication in electronic media is encouraged.
Signed articles do not necessarily represent the view of the EFF.
To reproduce signed articles individually, please contact the authors
for their express permission.
*This newsletter is printed on 100% recycled electrons*
=============================================================
MEMBERSHIP IN THE ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION
efforts and activities into other realms of the electronic frontier, we
need the financial support of individuals and organizations.
becoming a member now. Members receive our bi-weekly electronic
newsletter, EFFector Online (if you have an electronic address that
can be reached through the Net), and special releases and other
notices on our activities. But because we believe that support should
be freely given, you can receive these things even if you do not elect
to become a member.
Your membership/donation is fully tax deductible.
Our memberships are $20.00 per year for students, $40.00 per year
for regular members, and $100.00 per year for organizations. You
may, of course, donate more if you wish.
Our privacy policy: The Electronic Frontier Foundation will never,
under any circumstances, sell any part of its membership list. We
organizations whose work we determine to be in line with our goals.
But with us, member privacy is the default. This means that you
must actively grant us permission to share your name with other
=============================================================
Mail to: The Electronic Frontier Foundation, Inc.
238 Main St.
Cambridge, MA 02142
$20.00 (student or low income membership)
$40.00 (regular membership)
[ ] I enclose an additional donation of $_______
Name:
Organization:
Address:
City or Town:
State: Zip: Phone: ( ) (optional)
FAX: ( ) (optional)
Email address:
to my Mastercard [ ] Visa [ ] American Express [ ]
Number:
Expiration date:
Signature: ________________________________________________
Date:
other non-profit groups from time to time as it deems
appropriate [ ].
Initials:___________________________
