WEFsays it's time to start microchipping humans with "augmented reality"
An article posted on the World Economic Forum's website makes the
case for implantable microchips - including in healthy adults and
The article (https://bit.ly/3KmFNQB) sings the praises of what
it calls "augmented reality," a euphemism for transhumanism, and
predicts it will soon be normalized.
Transhumanists believe the next big leap in the evolution of humanity
will be directed by humans themselves, taking advantage of advancing
technologies that allow them to blur the line between human
physiology and computerized artificial intelligence.
In the article posted August 16 on its website, the WEF says:
- Augmented reality technology has the ability to transform society
and individual lives.
- As much as visual and hearing aids are a part of our lives today,
implant technologies could become the norm in future.
- Stakeholders in society will need to agree on how to ethically
make these amazing technologies a part of our lives.
Take a look at the short promotional video the WEF includes with
the article. https://youtu.be/ZUhJCbHflLM
Are we moving towards a 'brave new world'?" the article asks, adding:
- "As scary as chip implants may sound, they form part of a natural
evolution that wearables once underwent."
The WEF is attempting to conflate implantable microchips with
innocuous inventions like hearing aids, prosthetic legs and eye
glasses. This is a deliberate deception. Eye glasses and hearing aids
may improve our functionality as human beings but they don't have
the potential to change our very makeup as humans.
Yuval Noah Harari, an Israeli historian and chief adviser to the
WEF, has said that if he had access to artificial intelligence when
he was younger, he believes he would have discovered he was
a homosexual at age 11 or 12 instead of at 17. In fact, a Newsweek
article from September 8, 2017, made the case that AI can predict
"with startling accuracy" whether someone is gay or straight.
Tell me this is no different than wearing glasses or a hearing aid.
Not buying it.
The WEF is clearly starting to get defensive now that its anti-human
agenda is becoming more widely known among the masses. They are
no longer able to operate under a cloak of anonymity. The globalist
organization, based in Geneva, Switzerland, and headed by prominent
futurist and German economist Klaus Schwab, is one of the world's
main drivers for population control and what many critics believe
is the gateway to transhumanism - the experimental gene-based
Schwab has said he wants every person on the planet jabbed.
"As long as not everybody is vaccinated nobody will be safe," he
says in the video below, which of course was the exact opposite
of the truth. Those who got injected with the toxic spike protein
are the ones playing Russian roulette with their health, not to
mention they gave up their rights to bodily autonomy.
Schwab and his WEF comrades, which include vaccine peddler
Bill Gates, BlackRock CEO and ESG peddler Larry Fink, Metaverse
peddler Mark Zuckerberg, Harari, Hillary Clinton, Obama,
Pete Buttigieg, Justin Trudeau, Jacinda Ardern, Boris Johnson, etc.,
have all spent the last two years calling for a "Great Reset" of all
aspects of life on earth. This requires tearing up the existing world
order so we can "build back better," with digital money and digital
identities tied to a social credit scoring system.
The WEF is tightly connected to the global implementation of digital
health passports, requiring people to "show their papers" before they
can travel or enter public spaces.
Yet, the WEF is increasingly worried about its reputation. It
prefaces its August 16 article on microchip implants with an editor's
note that says the article has been "misrepresented" on sites that
Oh, those poor, misunderstood globalist elites. Don't you feel sorry
Anyway, back to the article, penned for the WEF by Kathleen
Philips, vice president R&D of the Interuniversity Microelectronics
Human implant technologies will soon become a commodity, the
article suggests, arguing that there are "solid, rational" reasons
for microchipping children with location trackers.
Philips argues that augmented reality technology "has the ability to
transform society and individual lives" and despite sounding
"scary," will undergo the same "natural evolution" as wearable
"Hearing aids or glasses no longer carry a stigma. They are
accessories and are even considered a fashion item. Likewise,
implants will evolve into a commodity," she writes.
In some ways, the article reads like an advertisement for
"The augmenting technology will help in all stages of life: children
in a learning environment, professionals at work and ambitious
senior citizens. There are many possibilities."
Philips further explains, adding:
- "Or another example: many children with attention deficit struggle
in school. In the best case, they get special education services or
classroom accommodations. However, with extra visual and audio
guidance that blocks off excess stimuli, an otherwise-enabled child
can cope with a standard school environment. And when class is
over and playtime begins, they can just take the aids off.
- "Augmented reality doesn't end there. Your phone might feel like
part of your body, but it's not put in through surgery. Technology
will become more intertwined with the body in the form of implants,
but it will also seamlessly integrate with the environment - you
might have sensors in a chair, for example."
Philips believes an augmented society (i.e. transhumanism) is more
or less inevitable and the only thing still up in the air is how
it will be regulated.
"The limits on implants are going to be set by ethical arguments
rather than scientific capacity," she writes.
For example, should children be implanted with microchips at
birth, or maybe when they enter school?
"There are solid, rational reasons for it, like safety," she writes,
while admitting that for some it might be a "bridge too far." You
know, like those insufferable Christians who believe it's biblically
suspect to be chipping your kids like farmers do livestock.
And who does Philips believe should have regulating authority
over the use of implantable microchips?
"Ethics should not be preached from an academic ivory tower.
Overarching or independent institutions should guide policymakers
and researchers in the augmented society on the do's and dont's
and help build the ethical framework on societal aspects of
augmented reality technology," she writes, without naming who
these "overarching" institutions might be.
She does give clues, however, pointing to the Council of Europe,
which recently launched a strategic action plan for issues raised
by the application of neurotechnologies, as well as the Rathenau
Institute, established by the Dutch government, which assesses the
impact of technology on people's lives.
In other words, it's the government that should decide what's
ethical and what's not in the use of transhumanist technologies.
No surprise there.
Let's not forget that WEF founder Klaus Schwab has predicted
a soon-to-arrive "Fourth Industrial Revolution," which he says will
"lead to a fusion of our physical, digital and biological identity."
So the WEF can say what it wants about its August 16 article
being "misrepresented" on sites that "spread misinformation."
Taken in the full context of prior statements made by Schwab and
Company, it's hard not to believe the worse of motives are behind
their drive to microchip the human population. This is a man who
has openly advocated, along with his supporters, for brain implants,
mandatory digital health passports, digital and programmable money,
basically the digitization of everything in so-called "smart cities,"
where people will "own nothing," will have "no privacy" but will
learn to like it.
This must be resisted with every fiber of our being. To do otherwise
will result in not only the relinquishment of our bodily autonomy,
but the death of our humanity.