[CONTACT]

[ABOUT]

[POLICY]

All Pfizer vaccinated will suffer

Found at: gopher.erb.pw:70/roman/phlog2022/68.txt

All Pfizer vaccinated will suffer in the near future

The Pfizer vax not worth the risk and more likely to ‘increase
illness rather than reduce it,' according to the Canadian COVID
Care Alliance's analysis of the jab's trial data.
The Pfizer COVID shot has done “more harm than good,” according
to research released by the Canadian COVID Care Alliance (CCCA).
A CCCA-produced video and an accompanying 50-page PDF
presentation provides a deep dive into data released by Pfizer
concerning the development and testing of their COVID shots.
The report by the CCCA is heavily cited, and all citations are
available for the reader or viewer in the PDF, which can be found
here (https://bit.ly/3IpRaW6).
At the outset of the presentation, the CCCA video quantifies and
contextualizes Pfizer’s claims about the risk reduction. As the
vaccines were being unveiled to the public, Pfizer said that the
shot showed 95 percent efficacy seven days after the second dose.
However, according the CCCA, the 95 percent actually referred
to a Relative Risk Reduction (RRR) whereas the Absolute Risk
Reduction (ARR) was only a mere 0.84 percent.
In the presentation video and in a shorter separate video, the CCCA
explains the difference between RRR and ARR as it pertains to the
Pfizer product.
In Pfizer COVID injection trial, eight out of 18,198 participants
who were vaccinated were reported to have developed COVID,
and in the unvaccinated placebo group 162 out of 18,325 were
reported to have developed COVID as well. According to the trial
data, even without the vaccine the risk of contracting COVID was
“extremely low” at 0.88 percent among the unvaccinated and 0.04
per cent amongst those in the vaccinated trial group.
This means that the net benefit or ARR that is shown in the trial
is 0.84 percent. The 95 percent number comes from relative
difference between the 0.88 percent number from the unvaccinated
group and the 0.04 from the vaccinated group.
“How many people would have chosen to take the COVID-19 vaccines
had they understood that they offered less than one percent over all
benefit?” asked the video narrator.
The report opened up the information provided in Pfizer’s six-month
report data, and said that it showed a “level one evidence of harm.”
The six-month data showed a RRR of 91.3 percent in the vaccinated
group compared to the placebo group in terms of positive cases.
However, there was also an “increase in illness and deaths” in the
vaccinated group compared to the placebo group.
“There’s no benefit to a reduction in cases if it comes at a cost of
increased illness and death,” said the CCCA.
The jabbed group data showed an increase in adverse events in most
every category. This information was included in the Pfizer report,
but only in the supplementary appendix (https://bit.ly/3IkjNDZ)
which is difficult to find. There was a 300 percent increase in
adverse events determined to have been caused by the product
in the jabbed group.
Severe adverse events – things that strongly interfere with
a person’s ability to function normally – were increased by 75
percent. This led the CCCA to state that the “Pfizer inoculations
increase illness rather than reduce it.”
There was also an increased risk of overall death in the vaccinated
group compared to the placebo group. There were 20 total deaths
recorded in the jabbed group whereas there were 14 in the placebo.
Of concern to the CCCA was that twice as many cardiovascular
related deaths occurred in the vaccinated group.
The presentation stressed how harmful the COVID jabs are for young
people especially considering that the “danger of sever COVID is so
low [for kids] that its difficult to quantify.”
Maddie De Garay was among the adolescents on whom Pfizer tested
its product. Soon after the shot, she developed
(https://fxn.ws/3qLBkPr) gastroparesis, nausea, vomiting, erratic
blood pressure, memory loss, brain fog, headaches, dizziness,
fainting, seizures, verbal and motor tics, and menstrual cycle
issues. She lost feeling from the waist down, lost bowel and bladder
control, and she had to have a feeding tube inserted because she
lost her ability to eat. She has been wheelchair-bound for months.
The CCCA called injecting children with the Pfizer jab “an
unacceptable risk to their health.”
When the FDA approved the jab for children five to 11 years of age,
Pfizer presented information that commented on the risk of
myocarditis – which is a serious heart-inflammation issue that can
lead to heart attack and stroke – and speculated
(https://bit.ly/3KtEsqR) that there would be zero vaccine-related
myocarditis deaths.
The CCCA believed this was a misleading speculation. According
to research (https://bit.ly/33BtejE), the greater risk of myocarditis
is long-term danger that shows one in five dying around six and
a half years after first experiencing myocarditis.
The CCCA paid particular attention to the difficulty of finding
accurate information of vaccine-related harm in Canada. The
organization believes that it is not possible that the official
numbers from Canada regarding serious illness and death
associated with the Pfizer jab should be so low when the
information from the trials and other countries is considered.
“It’s very difficult to report a COVID-19 inoculation adverse
event in Canada. A doctor has to do it on their own time, and it’s
an involved process. And then it goes through several levels of
bureaucratic approval before Health Canada even sees it. And
then they decide whether or not they think it was related to the
inoculation. The result is that adverse events don’t show up,”
the narrator said.
“It’s not reasonable to believe that an inoculation that elicited
adverse events in 78 percent of trial subjects elicited essentially
zero adverse events in a population wide rollout. What’s happening
is that the signal has been lost. It’s not that those adverse events
are gone. It’s just that we’re not finding them because we’re not
looking for them.”


AD: