Evidence of the futility of

Found at: gopher.erb.pw:70/roman/phlog2022/239.txt

Evidence of the futility of quarantine in Australia

Imagine if, in early 2020, the Australian people had been told that
a new disease, COVID-19, would cause just over 200 deaths in
Australia over the next two years. To respond it would be necessary
to lock people in their homes, force them to wear masks, coerce
them into getting an untested and dangerous inoculation to keep
their jobs, create medical apartheid, lock the “unvaccinated” out
of society, undermine the separation of powers by letting the
Executive create rules instead of the Legislature, and suspend the
laws of the land with state of emergency provisions
I am sure no Australians would have thought this to be either a
proportionate or sensible response. Yet recent data from the
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) has revealed that it is exactly
what has happened. As Nutritional and Environmental Medicine
specialist Professor Robyn Cosford explains, the latest COVID
death statistics show that the hysterical claims that there was
a deadly pandemic in Australia were completely wrong.
Cosford had to resign her job in order to speak out because of the
relentless attacks being mounted by medical authorities on any
practitioners who dare to think for themselves. When, as is finally
happening, the truth eventually emerges about the perils of the
vaccines and the extreme over-reaction to the COVID threat, it
is hard to see how Australia’s health system, including the doctors,
will ever regain public trust.
The ABS data record that 2,639 deaths were people who died
“with or from” COVID-19 by January 31, 2022. That equates with
less than 0.9 percent of total mortality in Australia. Of that 0.9
percent, only 8.6 per cent died “from” the virus: that is, had COVID
listed as the only thing on their death certificates. The remaining
91.4 percent had other conditions, usually pre-existing. It leaves
a figure of 226 people who died from COVID alone, which is 0.07
percent of the population, or seven in 10,000 people. It was never
a pandemic. That is perhaps why the ABC, the national broadcaster,
is lying about the death toll, yet more misreporting.
The ABS’s data on the age of people dying with or from COVID is
also revealing. As Cosford explains, the median mortality age in
Australia is 83.7 years: 81 for men and 86 for women. According
to an ABS report, the median age for those who died from
COVID-19 was 83.7 years (81.2 years for males, 86.0 years for
females). Almost exactly the same, in other words.
Australian politicians have boasted for two years that they were
“following the science” and listening to the best experts. They did
nothing of the sort. Most of these so-called “experts” have been
computer modellers using epidemiological projections based on
assumptions that turned out to be almost entirely wrong. A dart
board would have been better.
These modellers, ridiculously trying to correlate infection rates
and population movements, predicted that locking people in homes,
making them wear masks, closing the international borders, shutting
down retail stores and hospitality venues, imposing curfews, and
constraining people’s movements would somehow contain the virus.
It was all nonsense.
Then governments brutally mandated potentially dangerous vaccines
(which do not even meet the Therapeutic Goods Administration’s
own definition of what a “vaccine” is) claiming that this would
“stop the spread” of the virus. That claim was false, too. The
Australian authorities are now forced to admit that the jabs do not
stop infection or transmission, and do not give any extra protection
against COVID. Indeed, the fact that state governments are pushing
boosters is an implicit admission that they only work for a short
period. So when the governments insisted that they knew the
inoculations were safe and effective they were lying. They could not
possibly know that in such a short period of time. It is now clear
that the jabs are neither.
A clue into how such a debacle occurred has been provided by the
South Australian Senator Alex Antic. He asked the South Australian
state government, using a Freedom of Information request, for the
medical advice that the state government kept citing as its reasons
for locking down the state. Antic was given almost no information,
mainly because there was almost none.
Here is what probably happened within government circles. There
was never any genuine medical advice, despite all the claims from
politicians that they were “following the science.” That is why they
never made any effort to share it with the public.
Instead, it was fear-driven politics. In early 2020, spooked by
reports of what was happening internationally, panic set in.
Australia’s feckless politicians, determined to look like great
leaders, instructed their bureaucrats to issue outrageous health
orders. Some probably also had darker motives, although this has
to remain speculation. The fact that the Federal Health Minister,
Greg Hunt, was formerly director of strategy at the World Economic
Forum might not be trivial, for example.
A massive public campaign was mounted to get people to use unreliable
tests – now acknowledged to be so by the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration – to create hysteria about the number of “cases.”
The authorities neglected to mention that 99 percent of those “cases”
were people who either had no, or only mild, symptoms. Then they got
the epidemiological modellers to feed all this nonsense into their
computers and came up with a series of absurd, evil policies that
have deeply harmed Australia’s democratic fabric.
The truth is now out. But don’t expect Australian politicians to
finally start “following the science.” They never have.